LS
Life Sciences healthtech startup Insights management · HCP & payer analytics · ~200 employees

A billion rows of claims data.
Processed in under two hours.

A Life Sciences healthtech startup replaced Alteryx with Dataworkz as the data platform behind its customer-facing insights. Months of pipeline turnaround compressed into hours. $75K per quarter returned to the business.

1B+ rows of prescription & medical claims data per workflow
<2hrs end-to-end processing on the optimized stack (was months)
$75K quarterly TCO returned: licensing, EC2, IT ops
Alteryx → DW replacement story, same Databricks + Snowflake stack underneath
The deployment

What this firm runs on Dataworkz.

Customer
Life Sciences healthtech startup
Industry
Life Sciences, insights management for HCPs & payers
What Dataworkz replaced
Alteryx
What it powers
Customer-facing insight delivery to healthcare providers, payers, and life sciences brands
Scale
~200 employees · billion-row workflows · 18 Tableau dashboards delivered to customers
Deployment
AWS Kubernetes · Dedicated SaaS · horizontal scaling
Stack
Databricks Delta Lake→Dataworkz→Snowflake→Tableau
Status
Live
"
Because of Alteryx issues, we had to stagger our data projects out, it would take months to provide the analysis to our customers. Now with Dataworkz, we can deliver insights to our customers in near-real time, as soon as we get the data feeds from our sources.
BPA
BI Platform Architect
Life Sciences healthtech startup
Where the team started

A working data platform with three failure modes the BI team could not engineer around.

01 · Cycle time

Months to deliver analysis.

The team had to stagger customer projects because the platform could not run two analyses concurrently at the volumes their HCP partners were sending. Sales and CS were apologizing for delivery dates on the product the customers were paying for.

02 · Black-box pipeline

One failure meant restarting from zero.

When a transformation step failed mid-run, the only option was to restart from the beginning. Hours of compute thrown away on every error. No intermediate state to resume from.

03 · TCO that did not scale

Licensing + EC2 + core servers + IT ops.

The Alteryx footprint was a measurable quarterly line item. Adding HCP volume added cost faster than it added throughput. The bill went up; the team's velocity didn't.

The team had a working data platform. They needed a different one.

A 280-step transformation workflow. No pipeline code. Restartable from any step.

The team rebuilt the entire prescription-and-claims transformation workflow on Dataworkz. Same source data. Same downstream BI. A different platform underneath.

STAGE 01

Source

HCP partner feeds

Prescription + medical claims data refreshed on partner cadence.

STAGE 02

Lake

Databricks Delta Lake

Source of truth lives on the customer's existing data lake. No movement out of their environment.

STAGE 03 · CORE

Transform

Dataworkz 280-step workflow

Multi-format ingestion · structured transformation · business-rule application · reference lookups · final dataset assembly. Each step observable, restartable, auditable.

STAGE 04

Warehouse

Snowflake

Dataworkz writes to the customer's existing Snowflake. The BI team consumes those tables.

STAGE 05

BI

Tableau · 18 dashboards

Insight ships to the company's customers: providers, payers, life sciences brands.

The single biggest unlock is restartability. When a step fails, the team picks up from the failure point instead of restarting the whole pipeline. Compute cost and recovery time both fall. The pipeline used to be a black box the team had to babysit; now it's a workflow the team can operate.
What the team evaluated against

Stay on Alteryx. Build it in-house. Or move to a platform that handles billion-row workflows out of the box.

Option A · Stay on Alteryx

Cost the team could measure, going up.

Continue staggering customer projects. Continue absorbing the licensing + EC2 + core-server + IT ops bill. Continue restarting pipelines from scratch on every failure.

Status quo had a quarterly cost.
The choice · Dataworkz

280 steps live. 1B rows in under 2 hours.

Visual transformation workflow. Runs against the customer's existing Databricks + Snowflake stack. Scales horizontally on AWS Kubernetes the team already operated. Ships every workflow with end-to-end traceability and restart-from-step.

Months → hours. $75K/quarter returned.
Option B · Build in-house

Six-to-twelve-month engineering bet.

Multi-step, observable, restartable transformations on billion-row data is not a quarter-long build. A platform team the company didn't have, against a delivery deadline that was already slipping.

Build path was longer than the runway.

The team picked Dataworkz because the platform shipped against the actual workflow: billion-row claims data, 280 steps, on the customer's existing data infrastructure, without requiring the BI team to become a platform engineering team to keep it running.

What the team measured

Months to hours. Quarterly TCO returned. Customer onboarding doubled.

What they measured Before After
Time to process 1B-row prescription & claims dataset Months Under 2 hours
New data source onboarding 6 weeks 2 days
Quarterly TCO (licensing + EC2 + core servers + IT ops) Baseline $75K saved / quarter
Data refresh turnaround time Baseline 50% reduction
Customer onboarding throughput 1× 2×
Pipeline failure recovery Restart from scratch Restart from any step

Outcomes from production deployment at this customer.

The data work behind your product can ship at the speed your customers expect.

If you're at a peer firm: life sciences insights, payer analytics, HCP data networks, clinical outcomes platforms, three things matter from this deployment.

i.

The platform replaces a named tool.

Alteryx out, Dataworkz in. The transformation work that drove the decision was not a greenfield project, it was a working pipeline rebuilt on a new substrate. Brownfield migration is the realistic path for a BI team that already has a delivery deadline.

ii.

It runs on the data infrastructure you already have.

Databricks, Snowflake, AWS Kubernetes. No data movement, no new compute model to learn, no lock-in. The pieces the BI team already operated stayed in place.

iii.

Throughput shows up in the work your customers see.

Months-to-hours on the billion-row workload is the time your sales and customer-success teams stop apologizing for. The product gets faster on the outside because the platform got faster on the inside.

The data work behind your product is too important to wait six months to engineer in-house.

Book a working session with the Life Sciences team. We'll walk through the workflows in this case study against the data infrastructure your firm already runs on.

Runs on your data lake · Scales on Kubernetes · End-to-end traceability per step